To cause to grow or increase rapidly. Dancing a dance started by one couple who separate and choose different partners. The process continues until all present are dancing. Switch to new thesaurus. Abronia elliptica , sweet sand verbena. To increase or expand suddenly, rapidly, or without control: explode , mushroom. To make or become greater or larger: aggrandize , amplify , augment , boost , build , build up , burgeon , enlarge , escalate , expand , extend , grow , increase , magnify , mount , multiply , proliferate , rise , run up , soar , swell , upsurge , wax.
We woke up to find snow on the ground; We were caught in a heavy snow-shower; About 15 centimetres of snow had fallen overnight. It's snowing heavily. The weather has been very snowy recently. There were deep snowdrifts at the side of the road. Black indicates strong disagreement, and light gray indicates strong agreement the grayed markers indicate a non-response to the question about an international binding agreement.
The ego-networks for both actors illustrate that they have a diversity of political actors in their networks—they listed many sources of information, and they were, in turn, listed as sources by many others. We also see strong patterns in issue agreement and information flow. For example, the Nature Conservancy is an environmentally focused non-governmental organization that regularly lobbies for environmental protections at the federal level.
Most of their contacts agreed with the statement, and none disagreed.https://inamstelpenja.ml
Conni’s Avant Garde Restaurant: A Snowball’s Chance
These findings are consistent among all of our respondents: policy actors reliably cited sources who held the same ideological position as they did. In addition to these actors getting their information from those who already share the same opinions, the information is also amplified when it is transmitted through multiple pathways. These pathways describe our metaphorical chamber mechanism.
In other words, the same information gets diffused directly and indirectly through intermediary actors repeating that same information. Note that, from the perspective of the person receiving the information, this information appears to be coming from multiple sources, though, in fact, it is coming from a single source. When three people hold similar levels of agreement about a subject and pass information among themselves via multiple pathways, we call it an echo chamber.
Echo chambers are active in a network if the network has more transitive triads that form around a shared attribute or belief. In this case, any information that is passed through the chamber echoes the agreement they already share. The scientist from the University of Alabama, who strongly disagrees that there should be a binding commitment to reduce carbon dioxide, has one echo chamber in his network: he transmits information to a scientist and to the office of Senator Inhofe the Congressperson in his network.
The other scientist also transmits information to Inhofe, and because they all disagree with a binding greenhouse gas commitment, they form an echo chamber. The nodes are again shaded based on their responses to the question about whether there should be a binding agreement on climate change. The size of the nodes is reflective of the number of echo chambers—transitive triads among actors with the same ideological position—in which each actor is engaged.
The possible number of echo chambers for each ideological category is, of course, related to the number of respondents in each category; the respondents with the most echo chambers also display the most popular viewpoint. Echo chambers can occur randomly in a network. Imagine an alternative network where we randomly assign the same number of connections among the policy actors and the same distribution of attitudes that we found in our survey.
In such an alternative network, we could observe some echo chambers due to chance alone. We use ERGM to test our results and see if the presence of echo chambers in these findings can be explained by random chance or a combination of other possible network structures and attributes.
- The Adventures of Daisy Weal!
- Knowledge Discovery in Multiple Databases (Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing)!
- One Last Gift (Gift Series Book 1).
- Cerro Torre - a snowball's chance in hell!
ERGM enables us to simulate hundreds of thousands of alternate networks to estimate how important the echo chambers are in modeling our data. The results of our analysis show that echo chambers occur in our network more often than random chance or the other characteristics of the network would predict. Furthermore, the ERGM shows that chambers of agreement among political elites—the transitive triads—do not exist significantly outside those who agree to the attitudinal questions about climate politics.
Together, these findings confirm that echo chambers have formed in the U.
- The Turba Philosophorum.
- Example sentences?
- Empty Arms - Christian Bible Study (Christianity Today Small Group Bible Studies Book 7).
- a snowball's chance in hell.
- Cant Lose Weight? Unlock the Secrets that KEEP you FAT!?
Our analysis also found that scientific actors and those from the Executive Branch of the government were more frequently cited as sources of information than business organizations. Although it is encouraging that science is widely cited as a source of information on climate change in our network, we return now to the question of how scientific consensus can be so hotly contested in the political sphere. He was demonstrating politics in an echo chamber: the particular networks in which Inhofe—and all political elites—operate make it not only possible to assert that snow equals science, but it also makes such claims plausible.
The combination of ideological homophily and closed communication structures make arguments like this compelling for those who already agree with the position, but baffling for everyone outside the echo chamber.
Our results also demonstrate that while the debate about climate change engages many different sides of the argument, the critical information-gathering stage is strikingly homogenous. Political actors do not cross ideological or party lines until they are ready to argue. A true bi-partisan approach to climate change policymaking means breaking open these echo chambers at both the information-gathering and information-sharing stages. These findings are telling for the science communication process.
not have a ˌsnowball’s chance in ˈhell (of doing something)
It seems that climate science is more beholden to politics than politics is to the actual science. In the political arena, echo chambers structure how climate science is discussed, perceived, accepted, or dismissed by different political actors. Rather than discussing a single scientific consensus position, political actors can cherry-pick exactly which parts of the science they wish to amplify or undermine.
Echo chambers provide the perfect environment for such a selective discussion of scientific facts. The onus of breaking the echo chamber, then, is borne by those who advocate for greater scientific literacy in policymaking. Climate activists, and even scientists themselves, must be prepared to facilitate discussion among policy actors with diverging ideological views on climate change in order to break apart these echo chambers.
Snowball's Chance - Wikipedia
Furthermore, these opportunities for discussion should come as early as possible in the political process, perhaps even preceding the information-gathering stage. For issues as long-fought as climate change, it may be too late. But avoiding the persistent effects of echo chambers in other political issues may still be possible where the debate is young. This research also shows that responsible citizens must be careful with our own sources of scientific information if we want to ensure that our perception on any issue is accurate. Although the data here are gathered from political elites, echo chambers have important implications for information transmission in our own lives.
We face the same potential problems of cherry-picked information in our day-to-day routines as we turn to specific sources for information. As other researchers have noted, the online social media environment accentuates such echo chambers as we are able to create increasingly personalized media profiles.